The United Journals abides by the moral matters and would additionally conduct a legal review if needed. The journal ensures publication or advertising does not influence the choices of editors. The Editorial Board of the journal permits you to speak with alternative publishers, journals, and authors for the asking for affiliation.
An author is expected to contribute realistically. He/she must not embody identical analysis in one manuscript for a primary publication. The reported scope of labour has to be supported by necessary citation from the influencing publications. Any conflict in monetary or personal interest that might be in the manuscript, together with the small print of economic support and its sources, must be revealed.
The review process helps an editor to make a decision on an article and also enables the author to improve the manuscript and hence a reviewer’s work is of paramount importance. Therefore, the tutorial advancement of scientists is supported through peer-reviewed publications.
Confidentiality: Reviewers’ comments must be kept confidential. Manuscripts or copies of the method must be preserved with the reviewers once the process is completed.
Constructive Evaluation: The evaluation should be constructive that gives a positive insight to the author with no disputation or inefficiencies with the review process.
Competence: Reviewer with relevant experience must be allotted to review. Individuals lacking adequate experience must be responsible enough to decline the review.
Impartiality and Integrity: Reviewer’s evaluation must solely rely on scientific advantage, subject coherency, the scope of the journal rather on monetary, racial, gender or ethnic origin of the authors.
Timeliness and Responsiveness: Reviewer is accountable to finish the review within the stipulated time and may take all necessary steps to fulfil the restrictions of the journal.
Publication calls: The editorial board of the United Journal decides whether a submitted article will get published or not. An editor must abide by modern rules bearing on libel, infringement and plagiarism that are necessary. He/she is entitled to take a decision after consultation with reviewers or members of the editorial board.
Fair play: An editor must analyse manuscripts based on his or her intellectual content with race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors playing no part.
Confidentiality: The editors should not share any details of the submitted manuscript with anyone apart from the corresponding writers, reviewers, potential reviewers, alternative editorial advisers, and therefore the publisher, as applicable.
General duties and responsibilities of the editor:
1 Relations with readers
2 Relations with authors
3 Editors, the referee method, and relations with reviewers
4 In Relations with editorial board members
Identify adequately qualified editorial board members who will actively contribute and participate in proper management of the journal. Appoint editorial board members for a set term (e.g. 3 years). Throw light on expected functions and duties of the editorial board members concerning; which might include:
5 Relationship with publishers, owners, and advertisers
The relationship of editors with publishers and owners is commonly complicated and is primarily based on the principle of editorial independence. However, this may not be necessarily in every case. Irrespective of the economic and political realities of their journals, editors should make choices on quality articles and maintain similar standards for readers instead of immediate monetary or political gain. Editors must also have declared policies on advertising about the content of the journal and processes for publication supplements.
Conflict of interest
Editors must have a working mechanism for managing the conflicts of interest between themselves, their workers, authors and reviewers. Readers must be informed about who has funded the analysis and on the role of the funders within the research.
Guidelines for retracting articles
United Journals takes responsibility to maintain the integrity of the detailed record of our content for all finish users judiciously. United Journals gives prime importance to the authority of articles once they need to be revealed and our policy is decided on the tutorial publication community. It could be a general principle of studious communication that the editor of a learned journal is exclusive to or chargeable for deciding whether articles submitted to the journal shall be made public. In taking this decision, the editor follows the policies of the journal’s editorial board and is restricted by legal requirements such as that of libel, infringement, and plagiarism. The outcome of this principle is the studious archive as a permanent, historic record of the transactions of scholarship. Articles that are revealed shall stay precise and unreduced in a way as is feasible. However, sometimes unfortunate circumstances might arise where a writing is revealed that must later be taken back or even removed. Such actions should not be taken lightly and might solely occur under exceptional circumstances, such as:
Encouraging academic integrity
Ensuring the integrity of the educational record
Preclude business wants from compromising intellectual and moral standards.
Errors, inaccurate or deceptive statements should be corrected promptly as per their importance. Editors must follow the COPE guidelines on retractions.